10 July, 2009

Just give me a cell phone that does everything I need it to do

Thesis Statement:

There is no cell phone that does what I need it to do

Here's what I need:
  1. I need a phone that has a keyboard, and preferably a small compact keyboard that is easy to type on. I do not want a phone that has only a touch screen, because I cannot type well on them. I was fast as lightning on my old HTC Shadow. Now, I am completely hobbled on my iPhone because of typos. This requirement rules out the iPhone and a handful of other models.

  2. I need a phone that connect to my work email and calendar easily, without using a web browser to do it. That basically means I need Microsoft Exchange Server support. This requirement rules out the Blackberry which, from the sounds of it, is challenging at best to configure, and not sure if calendar or meetings is possible at all.

  3. I need a phone that has good signal in my neighborhood. This requirement rules out T-Mobile as a provider, because they've got basically no signal in my part of town.

  4. I need a phone that has navigation, maps, and web browsing, i.e. a Smartphone. This makes the list of choices short.
If those 4 things were all that I cared about, the decision would be, of course, to buy a Windows Mobile device, such as the Samsung Jack or Samsung Propel Pro. But in addition to the things I need, there are also things that I want.
  • I would prefer a phone that has a 3.5mm headphone jack so I can use the phone as my music player, with my good earbuds. Oops, that requirement rules out all of the Windows Mobile devices that AT&T carries which met my other requirements! The Samsung phones both use a stupid proprietary headphone jack and would require an awkward dongle to use my regular headphones.

  • I would prefer to be able to connect my phone as a music player to my car stereo. Only an iPhone seems to do that. I could not get my Zune to work, and I could not get any other mp3 player I own to work either, unless I use the radio tuner route, or the audio input directly, which is workable but inconvenient.

  • I would prefer the phone to have easy access to things like Facebook. This doesn't seem to rule out any of the options, but Blackberry and iPhone do it better than Windows Mobile
The bottom line is that, no matter which option I choose, especially with AT&T, I am hosed in one way or another. I love the iPhone in some ways. It gets all the little things right. But some of the big things it gets very wrong. Call dropping is an issue. Battery life is an issue. And typing, which I do a lot, is abyssmal. The latter is the reason I am on the verge of dumping my iPhone. But there needs to be a better option, and both Windows Mobile and Blackberry have Achilles' heels that, right out of the gate, I suspect will make the experience worse. Especially when you consider that they both lack nearly all of the bells and whistles the iPhone possseses.

There's really no winning. Perhaps the way to win is to say the hell with the Smartphone and go back to the Dumbphone?

08 July, 2009

Happiness... all depends where you live?

In my previous post, I was discussing the pros and cons of socialized medicine or, for that matter, socialized democracy in general. I have a somewhat idealistic view that things are better in other places, particularly Europe, than they they are here. I realize that I could be mistaken. The times that I have visited Europe, I have indeed felt that things made more sense there in a lot of ways, but I recognize that's a limited experience of "vacation" which is not the same as living there. Nonetheless, I did wonder, "Are people happier in Europe? Or are people happier elsewhere?"

I decided to do a little online research into happiness. Specifically, how does the happiness of people vary from nation to nation. Of course, it all depends how you define happiness, too.

I found a couple of good research projects that take different looks at the question.
  1. Subjective Well-Being Index
  2. Happy Planet Index
The SWB appears to be just that. A questionnaire that measured self-report of happiness throughout the world. The results were not particularly earth-shattering. You should take a look at the link above for details and references, but I'll paste the rankings list (SWLS = Satisfaction With Life Scale):

Nation SWLS


DENMARK 273
SWITZERLAND 273
AUSTRIA 260
ICELAND 260
BAHAMAS 257
FINLAND 257
SWEDEN 257
BHUTAN 253
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 253
CANADA 253
IRELAND 253
LUXEMBOURG 253
COSTA RICA 250
MALTA 250
NETHERLANDS 250
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 247
MALAYSIA 247
NEW ZEALAND 247
NORWAY 247
SEYCHELLES 247
ST KITTS AND NEVIS 247
UAE 247
USA 247
VANUATU 247
VENEZUELA 247
AUSTRALIA 243
BARBADOS 243
BELGIUM 243
DOMINICA 243
OMAN 243
SAUDI ARABIA 243
SURINAME 243
BAHRAIN 240
COLUMBIA 240
GERMANY 240
GUYANA 240
HONDURAS 240
KUWAIT 240
PANAMA 240
ST VINCENT AND THE 240
UNITED KINGDOM 237
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 233
GUATEMALA 233
JAMAICA 233
QATAR 233
SPAIN 233
ST LUCIA 233
BELIZE 230
CYPRUS 230
ITALY 230
MEXICO 230
SAMOA WESTERN 230
SINGAPORE 230
SOLOMON ISLANDS 230
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 230
ARGENTINA 227
FIJI 223
ISRAEL 223
MONGOLIA 223
SAO TOME AND PERINI 223
EL SALVADOR 220
FRANCE 220
HONG KONG 220
INDONESIA 220
KYRGYZSTAN 220
MALDIVES 220
SLOVENIA 220
TAIWAN 220
TIMOR-LESTE 220
TONGA 220
CHILE 217
GRENADA 217
MAURITIUS 217
NAMIBIA 217
PARAGUAY 217
THAILAND 217
CZECH REPUBLIC 213
PHILIPPINES 213
TUNISIA 213
UZBEKISTAN 213
BRAZIL 210
CHINA 210
CUBA 210
GREECE 210
NICARAGUA 210
PAPUA NEW GUINEA 210
URUGUAY 210
GABON 207
GHANA 207
JAPAN 207
YEMEN 207
PORTUGAL 203
SRI LANKA 203
TAJIKISTAN 203
VIETNAM 203
IRAN 200
COMOROS 197
CROATIA 197
POLAND 197
CAPE VERDI 193
KAZAKHSTAN 193
MADAGASCAR 193
SOUTH KOREA 193
BANGLADESH 190
CONGO REPUBLIC 190
GAMBIA 190
HUNGARY 190
LIBYA 190
SOUTH AFRICA 190
CAMBODIA 187
ECUADOR 187
KENYA 187
LEBANON 187
MOROCCO 187
PERU 187
SENEGAL 187
BOLIVIA 183
HAITI 183
NEPAL 183
NIGERIA 183
TANZANIA 183
BENIN 180
BOTSWANA 180
GUINEA-BISSAU 180
INDIA 180
LAOS 180
MOZAMBIQUE 180
PALESTINE 180
SLOVAKIA 180
BURMA 177
MALI 177
MAURITANIA 177
TURKEY 177
ALGERIA 173
EQUATORIAL GUINEA 173
ROMANIA 173
BOSNIA & HERZE 170
CAMEROON 170
ESTONIA 170
GUINEA 170
JORDAN 170
SYRIA 170
SIERRA LEONE 167
AZERBAIJAN 163
CENTRAL AFRICAN RE 163
MACEDONIA 163
TOGO 163
ZAMBIA 163
ANGOLA 160
DJIBOUTI 160
EGYPT 160
BURKINA FASO 157
ETHIOPIA 157
LATVIA 157
LITHUANIA 157
UGANDA 157
ALBANIA 153
MALAWI 153
CHAD 150
IVORY COAST 150
NIGER 150
ERITREA 147
RWANDA 147
BULGARIA 143
LESOTHO 143
PAKISTAN 143
RUSSIA 143
SWAZILAND 140
GEORGIA 137
BELARUS 133
TURKMENISTAN 133
ARMENIA 123
SUDAN 120
UKRAINE 120
MOLDOVA 117
CONGO DEMOCRATIC 110
ZIMBABWE 110
BURUNDI 100

I highlighted some ones that I thought were of interest in red. Mostly because of their absence of high placement on the list. Although the US is not that close to the top of the list, the difference between the US and the top is small enough, that they could generally be considered to be high on the list.

One has to wonder how reliable self-report of life satisfaction is. There are most definitely cultural biases that must play into one's tendency to report happiness or unhappiness. This scale was reported as being valid and reliable. But being valid and reliable does not necessarily mean that it is "true and accurate". Validity implies that it correlated well with some other accepted scale of similar measure. And reliable implies that the results are repeatable. Or something like that. I should be more rigorous if I am going to start defining things for you. But the bottom line is that we can't know that the people in the United Arab Emirates are exactly as satisfied with their lives as the people in the USA, just because their scores were similar. It does seem reasonable that countries with extreme strife, famine, war, and unrest would be appearing near the bottom of the list. And it makes sense that countries with much of the necessities provided by government, little strife or poverty and, not surprisingly, little diversity, are happier. Diversity creates much opportunity for conflict and for dissatisfaction. I make no value judgment on this, but it is worth noting that many of the nations near the very top are fairly homogeneous populations. I must confess, I know nothing about the population of Bhutan.

The second study, the Happy Planet Index, takes into account a series of factors in rating each nation. These include Life Expectancy, Life Satisfaction (which probably maps most closely to the SWLS above), and the big bonus item is the Ecological Footprint, which measures the consumption in the country, and thus, the impact on the planet. This is an added indication of sustainability of a particular lifestyle.

Their results, which were heavily colored by that ecological measure, were quite different from those seen in the first study listed. EF = ecological footprint, and HPI = the happy planet index. I have highlighted some countries in red. You'll notice the US is very far down the list, because of our insanely high ecological footprint.

Countries Life Sat Life Exp EF
HPI






Costa Rica 8.5 78.5 2.3
76.1
Dominican Republic 7.6 71.5 1.5
71.8
Jamaica 6.7 72.2 1.1
70.1
Guatemala 7.4 69.7 1.5
68.4
Vietnam 6.5 73.7 1.3
66.5
Colombia 7.3 72.3 1.8
66.1
Cuba 6.7 77.7 1.8
65.7
El Salvador 6.7 71.3 1.6
61.5
Brazil 7.6 71.7 2.4
61.0
Honduras 7.0 69.4 1.8
61.0
Nicaragua 7.1 71.9 2.0
60.5
Egypt 6.7 70.7 1.7
60.3
Saudi Arabia 7.7 72.2 2.6
59.7
Philippines 5.5 71.0 0.9
59.0
Argentina 7.1 74.8 2.5
59.0
Indonesia 5.7 69.7 0.9
58.9
Bhutan 6.1 64.7 1.0
58.5
Panama 7.8 75.1 3.2
57.4
Laos 6.2 63.2 1.1
57.3
China 6.7 72.5 2.1
57.1
Morocco 5.6 70.4 1.1
56.8
Sri Lanka 5.4 71.6 1.0
56.5
Mexico 7.7 75.6 3.4
55.6
Pakistan 5.6 64.6 0.8
55.6
Ecuador 6.4 74.7 2.2
55.5
Jordan 6.0 71.9 1.7
54.6
Belize 6.6 75.9 2.6
54.5
Peru 5.9 70.7 1.6
54.4
Tunisia 5.9 73.5 1.8
54.3
Trinidad and Tobago 6.7 69.2 2.1
54.2
Bangladesh 5.3 63.1 0.6
54.1
Moldova 5.7 68.4 1.2
54.1
Malaysia 6.6 73.7 2.4
54.0
Tajikistan 5.1 66.3 0.7
53.5
India 5.5 63.7 0.9
53.0
Venezuela 6.9 73.2 2.8
52.5
Nepal 5.3 62.6 0.8
51.9
Syria 5.9 73.6 2.1
51.3
Burma 5.9 60.8 1.1
51.2
Algeria 5.6 71.7 1.7
51.2
Thailand 6.3 69.6 2.1
50.9
Haiti 5.2 59.5 0.5
50.8
Netherlands 7.7 79.2 4.4
50.6
Malta 7.1 79.1 3.8
50.4
Uzbekistan 6.0 66.8 1.8
50.1
Chile 6.3 78.3 3.0
49.7
Bolivia 6.5 64.7 2.1
49.3
Armenia 5.0 71.7 1.4
48.3
Singapore 7.1 79.4 4.2
48.2
Yemen 5.2 61.5 0.9
48.1
Germany 7.2 79.1 4.2
48.1
Switzerland 7.7 81.3 5.0
48.1
Sweden 7.9 80.5 5.1
48.0
Albania 5.5 76.2 2.2
47.9
Paraguay 6.9 71.3 3.2
47.8
Palestine 5.0 72.9 1.5
47.7
Austria 7.8 79.4 5.0
47.7
Serbia 6.0 73.6 2.6
47.6
Finland 8.0 78.9 5.2
47.2
Croatia 6.4 75.3 3.2
47.2
Kyrgyzstan 5.0 65.6 1.1
47.1
Cyprus 7.2 79.0 4.5
46.2
Guyana 6.5 65.2 2.6
45.6
Belgium 7.6 78.8 5.1
45.4
Bosnia and Herzegovina 5.9 74.5 2.9
45.0
Slovenia 7.0 77.4 4.5
44.5
Israel 7.1 80.3 4.8
44.5
Korea 6.3 77.9 3.7
44.4
Italy 6.9 80.3 4.8
44.0
Romania 5.9 71.9 2.9
43.9
France 7.1 80.2 4.9
43.9
Georgia 4.3 70.7 1.1
43.6
Slovakia 6.1 74.2 3.3
43.5
United Kingdom 7.4 79.0 5.3
43.3
Japan 6.8 82.3 4.9
43.3
Spain 7.6 80.5 5.7
43.2
Poland 6.5 75.2 4.0
42.8
Ireland 8.1 78.4 6.3
42.6
Iraq 5.4 57.7 1.3
42.6
Cambodia 4.9 58.0 0.9
42.3
Iran 5.6 70.2 2.7
42.1
Bulgaria 5.5 72.7 2.7
42.0
Turkey 5.5 71.4 2.7
41.7
Hong Kong 7.2 81.9 5.7
41.6
Azerbaijan 5.3 67.1 2.2
41.2
Lithuania 5.8 72.5 3.2
40.9
Djibouti 5.7 53.9 1.5
40.4
Norway 8.1 79.8 6.9
40.4
Canada 8.0 80.3 7.1
39.4
Hungary 5.7 72.9 3.5
38.9
Kazakhstan 6.1 65.9 3.4
38.5
Czech Republic 6.9 75.9 5.4
38.3
Mauritania 5.0 63.2 1.9
38.2
Iceland 7.8 81.5 7.4
38.1
Ukraine 5.3 67.7 2.7
38.1
Senegal 4.5 62.3 1.4
38.0
Greece 6.8 78.9 5.9
37.6
Portugal 5.9 77.7 4.4
37.5
Uruguay 6.8 75.9 5.5
37.2
Ghana 4.7 59.1 1.5
37.1
Latvia 5.4 72.0 3.5
36.7
Australia 7.9 80.9 7.8
36.6
New Zealand 7.8 79.8 7.7
36.2
Belarus 5.8 68.7 3.9
35.7
Denmark 8.1 77.9 8.0
35.5
Mongolia 5.7 65.9 3.5
35.0
Malawi 4.4 46.3 0.5
34.5
Russia 5.9 65.0 3.7
34.5
Chad 5.4 50.4 1.7
34.3
Lebanon 4.7 71.5 3.1
33.6
Macedonia 5.5 73.8 4.6
32.7
Congo 3.6 54.0 0.5
32.4
Madagascar 3.7 58.4 1.1
31.5
United States of America 7.9 77.9 9.4
30.7
Nigeria 4.8 46.5 1.3
30.3
Guinea 4.0 54.8 1.3
30.3
Uganda 4.5 49.7 1.4
30.2
South Africa 5.0 50.8 2.1
29.7
Rwanda 4.2 45.2 0.8
29.6
Congo, Dem. Rep. of the 3.9 45.8 0.6
29.0
Sudan 4.5 57.4 2.4
28.5
Luxembourg 7.7 78.4 10.2
28.5
United Arab Emirates 7.2 78.3 9.5
28.2
Ethiopia 4.0 51.8 1.4
28.1
Kenya 3.7 52.1 1.1
27.8
Cameroon 3.9 49.8 1.3
27.2
Zambia 4.3 40.5 0.8
27.2
Kuwait 6.7 77.3 8.9
27.0
Niger 3.8 55.8 1.6
26.9
Angola 4.3 41.7 0.9
26.8
Estonia 5.6 71.2 6.4
26.4
Mali 3.8 53.1 1.6
25.8
Mozambique 3.8 42.8 0.9
24.6
Benin 3.0 55.4 1.0
24.6
Togo 2.6 57.8 0.8
23.3
Sierra Leone 3.6 41.8 0.8
23.1
Central African Republic 4.0 43.7 1.6
22.9
Burkina Faso 3.6 51.4 2.0
22.4
Burundi 2.9 48.5 0.8
21.8
Namibia 4.5 51.6 3.7
21.1
Botswana 4.7 48.1 3.6
20.9
Tanzania 2.4 51.0 1.1
17.8
Zimbabwe 2.8 40.9 1.1
16.6

I am not sure how fair it is to look at this scale as a reflection of happiness, because individual happiness at a given point in time does not depend on sustainability of that happiness. According to this scale, people in countries like Luxembourg and the USA are "not as happy as they think they are" because their lifestyle depends on behaviors that are simply not sustainable. So it's got something to do with the reality of future unhappiness. Of course, that is on the assumption that countries do not radically change their behavior long before the unhappy time comes.

I was interested to see if there is a correlation between the HPI's Life Satisfaction sub-measure and the SWLS from the first scale, because I think that would provide some form of validation. Looking across the 140 countries for which both measures collected data, the correlation was 76% between the two measures. Not too shabby. I wanted to look at the outliers from this data; i.e. the countries where one index had a very different result than the other. To do this, I normalized both indices to their respective mean values, and then took the ratio of the two indices, Life Sat from HPI divided by the Self-Report SWLS measure. The chart below shows only the outliers. Out of the 140 countries, 109 of them had a ratio of the two measures that fell in a plus or minus 20% from unity. The chart below has 31 countries on it. The ones in red were ones where the HPI was more than 20% higher than the SWLS (16/31), and the ones in green were ones where SWLS was more than 20% higher than HPI (15/31).


I wonder what can be said about these differences? For the most part, it appears that it is African countries that were disproportionately higher on the SWLS measure. And it appears to be largely former Soviet or Eastern European and Middle East countries that were disproportionately higher on the HPI Life Sat measure.

It would be fun to dig into these differences, in terms of the questions or metrics used, to see if there's a good explanation.

The best medical care in the world

I have little doubt that the best medical care in the world is available in the United States. We have access to technology broadly, and we have excellent medical training in the latest techniques. But the catch is the term "available", because not everyone has access to this. Some people in this country have no medical care. Or limited coverage. Or extremely poor quality facilities that offer nowhere near the highest level of care.

But even if you have great medical care, there is a compartmentalization and corporatization of your healthcare that is maddening. Everything is governed by the policies of the insurance companies. And the staff at the insurance companies know nothing about your health, and for the most part nothing about the medical aspects of the procedures or care that is required or provided. They only know what their pamphlets say is covered or not covered. And they also have a vested interest in making sure that as little is covered as possible according to their terms. Because they are in this for a profit, not for your well-being.

Thus, to see a specialist, you often need to see your primary care physician, who understands nearly nothing about what the specialist will provide. This primary care physician needs to be the gatekeeper for determining if you have permission to see the specialist. It isn't really called "permission" though. It's their professional expert assessment of the need. And one thing doctors are great at doing is giving you expert assessments, regardless of whether they know what they're talking about or not. Of course, the doctor will tell you what you need to do, but they have no idea whether this is covered by insurance, and they also have no idea what the typical costs are for such a procedure. It is not their business to know such things. You could argue that it's better the doctor doesn't know, because then your medical advice is based purely on need, rather than on cost savings or profit. But if the doctor knew that procedure A is $1000 and is not covered, whereas procedure B is $100 and is covered, and 90% as effective as A, then they could offer you the choice.

After figure out what is covered and what is not, which requires great nuisance, and often embarrassment and feelings of privacy violation, you see your doctor, and then perhaps you are given a prescription. Again, the doctor knows nothing about costs or coverage. And then you need to go to yet another place, the pharmacy, to have this prescription filled by someone who knows about as much about biology and medicine as I know about astrophysics, and they give you your medicine.

This process seems messed up.

Contrast this with the European system, where everyone has healthcare. And where you go to the doctor when you think you need to go to the doctor. If you need to see a specialist, you are sent to a specialist. And for many basic types of illnesses, the doctor gives you the pills that you need, and you're done. There's no talking to beaurocrats. And there's no red tape. The process is that you get treated, and it costs you little or nothing. It's humanizing. Nobody is in that business to make a profit.

You hear stories about the long wait to see a doctor, or the poor quality of care. But the same exact thing is possible here in the US, unless you have the most elite of health plans. If you go to a typical HMO clinic, you will have long waits, and poor quality care. If you go to even the best of emergency rooms, you will undoubtedly have a long wait unless you are literally almost dead on arrival.

Nobody in control in this country wants you to take a good, hard look at what happens in the civilized world, because it would be unfathomable the discrepancies between here and the rest of the world. We need to resort to asinine assertions of poor quality care (which we also provide in great portions here, when we provide coverage at all), and when that fails, we throw out the big "S" card: Socialism. Somehow, "socialism" has become a curse word in this country. We heard it thrown around left and right during the presidential campaign. But somehow, it was not socialistic to bail out our banking corporations and our auto manufacturers. Is it more, or less socialistic to subsidize corporations or citizens? I am not sure. I guess there's a difference between socialism and corporate welfare.

How a nation can allow individuals to live without medical care, and yet call itself civilized, is beyond me. But I guess that's what being "free" is all about. It's the freedom to have nothing.

07 July, 2009

Hard Stuff... Easy Stuff...

Here's the way it works.

Anything that I can do is, by definition, "easy".
Anything that I cannot do is, by definition, "hard".

Therefore, the following things are easy:
  • Tuning a guitar without a tuner
  • Estimating the logarithm of any number
  • Giving a presentation without practicing it or thinking about it first
  • Figuring out the chords to a song without a guitar in hand
  • Making charts in Excel
  • Finding "the best deal" on the internet for [insert item here]
  • Making pizza
And the following things are hard:
  • Anything resembling actual "art"
  • Violin
  • Reading piano music
  • Learning Russian
  • Skiing
  • Writing songs
  • Skating
  • Being positive
  • Tiling
  • Concentrating on one thing for more than 30 minutes

03 July, 2009

Socialism means clean rest stops

What do you think of, when you think about rest stops on the beautiful highways of America?

Well, I think about dirty nasty restrooms, trucks, beef jerky and other assortments of the unhealthiest snacks on the planet. I think about fast food chains like Popeye's and Sbarro, which are so repellent, that they are virtually relegated to highway stops. I think about specimens of the human race that seem so abhorrent and aberrant, that I wonder how there are not actually other definable sub-species of Homo sapiens. I suppose there are. I mean, it's not that we technically can't breed with them, but we sure as hell won't breed with them, and that's got to count for something, doesn't it?

That's the slice of America that you get driving down our interstate highways.

Contrast this, if you will, with Austria. On my recent trip there, let me tell you what I found at each of the autobahn rest stops. We were reluctant, when driving across Austria, to settle for stopping for lunch at the rest stop. We knew it was going to be nasty, of course. And we had no choice. We were hungry, needed to use a restroom, and didn't want to drive 30 kilometers toward nowhere, looking for something. So, we bit the bullet, and stopped. And what did we find? I honestly do not believe I can describe this to you in a way that would be believable. We parked our Smart car, entered the rest stop facility, and encountered a giant marketplace that could only be described as something that would make you turn your nose up at Whole Foods or PCC. The rest stop had fresh fruits, baked goods, a Cafe, prepared foods, fresh pastas cooked to order that had just come out of a pasta machine, wines, gelato, the list goes on. It was some sort of fantasy land of rest stops. And the people? They looked like you and me. Well, like me, anyway. I don't know what the hell you look like. And they wanted a good lunch, or a snack. And they got it. And the prices were not unreasonable. And the food quality was excellent. And the people were nice, not to mention that they spoke English.

This happened at two different rest stops. The second rest stop was even more fancy. We did, unfortunately, get yelled at by someone for attempting to photograph the pasta machine. I am not sure why, and I don't know what he said, but I think he just didn't want to be on camera and was probably sick of Americans, who were seen being rude to all, in every direction. That was the one downside of these rest stops, was that there were tour buses full of Americans, and I was quickly reminded of why it is that we are not loved everywhere that we go. Maybe it's because we have a sense of entitlement, and an attitude of superiority, which is woefully ironic, since the best I can tell is that we could learn a lot from European culture. Instead, it seems we picked all the worst elements of it, and adopted those as our platform for the nation.

It occurred to me during my trip that you can probably tell a lot about a country's attitudes and priorities by visiting places such as rest stops, where the only reason to invest in such a thing would be because of a sense of duty, pride, or obligation. A sense that people deserve to have quality and options that are not dehumanizing. I don't know if that's part and parcel of what socialized democracy is all about? Or if it's just that America's highways got left behind, because about half of our tax revenue (which, I might add, is lower than most other countries to start with) is thrown at the military.

If you look at the rest stop as a barometer of the nation's concern for basic well-being of its citizens, and the degree of pride in always being at least "acceptable", then this country is not receiving very high marks.

But you probably already knew that.

01 July, 2009

JOSW Day 8: The Lakes of central Austria

It's an amazing feeling when you can drive across an entire country in a day. You cannot drive across Montana in a day, without knocking yourself out. And furthermore, you wouldn't want to do it. But Europe offers the luxury of transitioning from one wonderful thing to another, with minimal effort.

After we made it out of Salzburg, on the 158, it was an easy drive to the lakes region. We rolled into a village called Attersee, that Rachel had heard or read about. She thought it would be a good place to spend the first night, and she was right. It was pretty, and small, and on a beautiful lake. We had no idea where we were going to eat, and no idea where we were going to stay. So we went to a "souvenir" shop that was located on the edge of the village and attempted to ask the storekeeper for information. She told us to go to the information booth that was located a few hundred meters up the road. There was, indeed, an information kiosk, with a touch screen, that had answers in any language, to just about any question you could ask. Now tell me, if you went to a small village in Washington, such as, say, Sultan, and looked for a touch screen information kiosk with German or Italian language options, what do you think you would find? So, of course, you're probably expecting this is a tourist trap, and that the streets would be mobbed with obnoxious people, and buses, and all the restaurants would be full of loud foreigners, right? Nope. There was nary a soul to be found on the streets. This is just a culture that believes that it should be ready for the possibility that people will want information. It is a culture that welcomes other cultures, and exploration of their culture. There's a pride in that.

We found a "Pension" (bed and breakfast) that looked good, called Pension Huber. It said there were rooms available. After a tiny amount of fumbling about, we located it rather easily, up a little hill in the middle of the village, near a church. Unfortunately, we arrived a little too late, and all their rooms had been taken. It was, after all, a Friday night. But the owner, even with very limited English, worked with us, and made several calls to other places, and found us a place to stay that was only about 2 miles away from there, in another even smaller village called Abtsdorf. We started driving there, unsure of exactly where the turn would be. We saw a slightly ambiguous brown street sign with an arrow pointing toward Abtsdorf. So we take the turn. After driving a minute or two, the road gets narrower, to barely a lane. We pass some houses. Then the road turns to gravel. Then to dirt. And then, it ends. And there is a sign that says "Abtsdorf, 40 minuten" with an arrow. How the hell are we supposed to drive on that? And why does it say 40 minutes? Then, we notice that another sign says "Wanderweg". And suddenly it becomes clear. The brown signs were directing us to nature trails and "Wanderweg" basically means "Wander Way" or "Walking Trail". Fortunately, the Smart Car can U-turn on a dime, so we go back and find the real road to Abtsdorf, which was a completely respectable paved way.

And the place, whose name I cannot even recall, though I think the innkeeper was named Marianna, was on a high plateau, overlooking the lake in the distance, with a peaceful balcony, and very nice room. The innkeeper spoke virtually no English, and we both spoke in our own languages to each other, gleaning only about 5% of the meaning, which was enough to take care of the rules, the breakfast schedule, checkout time, the keys, and not much else. The place cost 52 Euro, including a nice breakfast of breads, cheese, cereals, yogurt, coffee, and juice. That's about $73 which, if you ask me, is not a bad price for being in a quaint paradise that is uniquely yours.

We drove into town, intent on finding more kasespaetzle. The first restaurant we went to looked promising, and they did indeed have it on the menu. But after we were seated, it became clear, sort of, that because it was after 9pm, they were on the limited menu, which was only things like soups and bratwurst. So we labored over where to go, and the waiter suggested another cafe just up the street that was still serving full dinner. We went to the other cafe, and ended up having a spectacular dinner. Kasespaetzle, indeed. An Austrian soup that had a potato and cheese-based dumpling in it, and delicious salads. I can't remember what Rachel ordered, but I am pretty sure it was good too. As was the case on most days, dinner plus the corresponding drinks knocked us nearly unconscious, and it was lights out not long after that.

Neverending roadwork

I am going to jump to "now" for a moment to rant to you about what I perceive to be an absolute travesty. In all of the years I have lived in King County, there has not been one single moment when there is not at least one major highway undergoing significant revision or closure. I lived in Boston for many years, and projects would be started, and projects would be completed. Even "The Big Dig" had a beginning and an end, and that was a mammoth project that involved completely demolishing one roadway, and building another one, without ever having the path from point A to point B closed down.

King County has been trying to do things like repave, or occasionally modify an exit ramp, or widen an existing highway by a lane, on each of its 4 major highways (405, 520, 90, and 5) constantly for the last 10 years. Major onramps have been completely hobbled due to barrels that narrow lanes, and projects that appear to be languishing in eternal stagnation. And the "Murphy's Law" of King County roadwork is that they will close exactly the number of lanes required to make things impassable, at all times of day. If it is 2am, and there is light traffic flow, let's close ALL the lanes, to make sure the commute remains unbearable.

This area is one big disaster, all the result of poor planning. The traffic problem itself was caused by poor design of the highway patterns, with ramps spaced too closely, and with "Exit Only" lanes on the left side of interstate highways. And they are needing to replace support structure for many of the elevated highways and bridges in this area, because of poor original design. And, in true King County fashion, there is so little citizen interest in demanding better infrastructure, that nobody seems to notice that these projects are lasting forever.

If you want to have a new sports stadium, that will get done on a schedule. But if you want a public transit system, or roads that are not constantly in a state of "Cone-age" or "Rough Pavement", you'll have to wait until 2035 or so, when the entire current state government is deceased.

30 June, 2009

JOSW Day 7-8: Out of Salzburg and into the countryside

I will spare you the detail of how I spent a fourth day vegetating in the Schloss, while Rachel worked. I did not regret this at the time, as it was nice to be close to her, and to not be in the rain. But in hindsight, I really think I should have been more motivated and dragged my ass to a coffee shop somewhere in the city of Salzburg, where I could have watched people, written, and paid way too much to drink coffee all day. But I shouldn't belabor things that are over and done.

Rachel and I did not plan our long weekend in advance. We could have come up with a plan. We could have mapped it all out, and contacted places in advance, and decided which sights we wanted to see. We did not. We only knew that we wanted a car, and after doing some research, decided that the LaudaMotion Smart Car option made the most sense. They have offices at several of the Bahnhof locations in Austria. It was going to be cheap and easy. We decided to go down to the Bahnhof before the office closed on Thursday evening; not to actually get the car, but to get the details and make sure that we had everything clear about the requirements and all. And possibly to check out other car rental options, though they seemed like longshots. If we could rent a manual transmission car, then it was a viable option, at around 100 Euro for the three days. But for an automatic, the Smart Car was the way to go. We spoke with the dude at the LaudaMotion counter, who was very friendly, and he told us to either reserve online, or just come back in the morning, and it would be no problem. Our attempts to check out other car rental places failed, as they had all closed at 6pm. So our decision was made. We didn't know where we were going, but we knew how we were getting there. A little bit backwards, but from a systems point of view, not a bad design plan.

We could go to Innsbruck (to the west). We could go to Vienna (to the east). We could go to Ganz (to the south). We probably could not do all of these. Instead of making that decision, we decided to go to dinner. We went back to the place we had our first dinner together in Salzburg, which I now remember to be called Stieglbrau. It was a restaurant that was actually affiliated with a Best Western, though it looked like nothing of the sort. The reason we returned to the same place twice is because we wanted very much to again partake of their kasespaetzle, which was really really good. Sadly, we ask our waitress "Haben sie kasespaetzle?" and she says "No". So we then switch to English, since that was the extent of our German, and say "Well, you had it the other day" to which she again says "No". Okay, so this is not true. Because we ate it the other day, and we ate it there. She then remembers that it was a monthly special item, and it is no longer offered. So we ordered something else. I cannot remember what I got, but it was good. I think Rachel got spinach ravioli. And I think I got some other sort of pasta dish. But we were both sorry about the lack of spaetzle.

The next morning, we took the bus to get the car from the train station. I realize that is a lot of vehicle types in one sentence. When we arrived, there was a sign saying that they were away from the counter, or some such thing, so we decided to go for coffee and breakfast at a small cafe whose name, again, I cannot recall, just up the road from the station. We ended up spending quite a long time at the cafe; over two hours, because we were waking up and making decisions about what we would actually do with the car when we got it. So instead of starting first thing in the morning, we went to get the car at around 1:30pm. Our friend at LaudaMotion helped us make the reservation, but then he was having computer problems so he told us to come back in 15 minutes, which made us wonder, "What if the computer problems don't get solved? No car?" Anyway, we waited the 15 minutes, and got more coffee, and then went back, and everything was working. Good news was that for only 2 Euro extra a day, we could both drive the car, even though I did not have the permit. This would not have been the case with other agencies. And this was important, because it turned out that only I drove, so it would have been a very different story. I am sure Rachel would have been happy to drive, but it wasn't necessary.

Getting a car, in another country, when you don't know the roads, presents the problem of navigation. How the hell will I even find my way out of the parking lot? We asked the guy for maps. He asked if we wanted a city map or a country map. So we said "Both". And what we ended up with were a city map and a "State" map. Namely, the "State" of Salzburg. This is not particularly helpful once you get outside the state of Salzburg, in the same way that having a map of New Jersey would not help you find your way around New York City. But it was all we had.

We had decided that we would drive to a lake region that included such lakes as Mondsee, Attersee, and Wolfgangsee. It was supposed to be beautiful and rustic, and peaceful. That was our plan. We did not know what we would see, but we knew that we would take Highway 158 to get there, avoiding (for the moment) the Autobahn A1, since we thought this would be more scenic, and we also didn't want to pay another 7.7 Euro to get a "highway tax pass". Partly, because of the money, but also because neither of us was keen on needing to attempt to request such an item at the gas stations, which is where such things would be available. Getting to the highway involved driving across town, which required the Salzburg "city" map. Apparently this map was at like a 1:1 scale, because we kept thinking we had a little ways before the next turn, and then "Oops!" we passed our turn. So there was some turning around, and there was some confusion, and there was one occasion where someone either honked or gesticulated at me. I did my best to not have a tantrum. Rachel was "the navigator". Because I do not want to be beaten to a pulp, I will offer no commentary here about the navigation!

Wandering around when you don't know what you're doing, where you're going, or where you're staying can be liberating, or frustrating. It's all a question of attitude.

JOSW Day 6: Did I mention it was raining?

Wednesday. I did spend a third day in the Schloss, vegetating. I want to believe it was relaxing, but I think it was partly laziness and not wanting to deal with the rain and strike out on my own. It was easier to just sit in the quiet Schloss, and have lunch with Rachel. And then go pursue the evening together. There were some "important" people wandering into town over these few days, because there was going to be a board meeting. Best for me to be somewhat scarce, and hide on the balcony where I will not be seen or heard. Not that it really mattered.

We were trying to decide whether we were going to rent a car or a Smart Car. Doing internet searches. Asking around. Apparently, it would cost 18 Euro per day to rent the Smart Car, plus an additional 20 Euro for every 100 kilometers that we go beyond the daily allowance of 100 kilometer. Did some math, and decided that this would likely still be cheaper for the three days that we wanted to tour around, than the base cost of a regular rental, which would have run us at least 150 Euro, and may have had restrictions on which one of us was allowed to drive (meaning, it might have forced Rachel to drive, since she was the one with the international permit).

After doing an exhaustive analysis, including Excel spreadsheets, I decided on the Smart Car. But we didn't need to take care of that until the next day.

For dinner on Wednesday, we went to the Afro Cafe, which was a cool African styled and themed restaurant in the Altstadt (Old Town). The atmosphere was good, though we did sit outside, which had slightly less atmosphere than the funky interior. I ordered an Ostrich burger. Yes. Not Osterreich, as in Austria, but Ostrich, as in the bird. At least, that is what I think it was supposed to be. Maybe it was a joke and was actually just a frozen hamburger, named after Austria? Rachel got some sort of wrap that had a large amount of goat cheese in it. I think hers was better than mine. So I was a little jealous.

What we did after dinner that night, I can scarcely recall. Though I do believe it had stopped raining, for the most part, and that we walked home.

If I do not start recalling this at a rate of greater than one day per day, I will be forgetting everything that I am supposed to be telling you.

Did you know there are a lot of really cool cars out there?

Unfortunately, in the United States, you just can't buy them. There are entire manufacturers that are basically absent from the US: Renault, Fiat, Skoda, Alfa Romeo, Citroen, Opel, Peugeot, Seat. And then, among the car companies that do sell in the US, there are additional models from Honda, Toyota, Mazda, Mercedes, Audi, VW that are not available in the US. And, by and large, all of these cars are fuel efficient, smaller vehicles. Some of them are tiny cars, in the realm of the Yaris or Scion xD for size. But many of them are in the realm of the 3-dr Civic Hatchback that was so popular in the US (yet, oddly discontinued a few years ago). Almost every manufacturer makes a 3-dr hatchback available in Europe. Many of these are diesel. Some are not.

Why can you not buy these cars in the US? That's my first question. Another question is: Why are so many of the European manufacturers completely absent from the US? I don't know the answer to these questions, though I am sure I could do a simple Google (I mean Bing) search and find a ton of information.

I found this Popular Mechanics article on 10 small cars that can't be found in the US. That's good if you want to see some examples of the vehicles I am talking about. And then, this Forbes Magazine story talks about some reasons why these types of cars are not available. They state it has to do with a few main points: 1) Diesel engines (which some of these cars have) have not really caught on in the US (I would assert that is hogwash, and on contrary, the diesel engine has been dissuaded, rather than not catching on), 2) Emissions standards are tough for European manufacturers to meet, and 3) Americans prefer roomier cars over the small economical hatchbacks.

I want to focus on #3 because I do really believe that this comes down to supply and demand. And that there is not a demand for these cars. And I believe there's not a demand for them because we are being "trained" through marketing and advertising, to believe that we should want bigger, roomier, more powerful, "safer" cars. It's almost synonymous with America. Everything we do and are is of the guise of being bigger, safer, and more powerful. But do we need any of those things? And do they really make us safer? In Europe, I observed that maybe only 10-20% at most, of vehicles, were SUV or minivans. And it's not that Europeans don't have children. It's that they are making different choices, and those choices are available to them.

I could come up with all sorts of conspiracy theories as to why we are having big vehicles pushed on us. My top conspiracy theory is that the US oil industry wants cars to stay less efficient, because every gallon of gas you don't buy, is $2, or $3, or maybe someday (again) $4 of income that the oil industry doesn't earn. If fuel efficiency went from 22mpg average (for example) to 44mpg average (to keep the numbers round), then oil companies would get half as much income from the biggest gas-guzzling country on the planet. So, it kind of seems like there might be some collusion there, either directly between oil industry and auto industry, or via the dirty middleman that is the lobbying process around trade and importation.

These cars that I saw over there were great looking cars, too. Fuel efficient, and great looking. And that's the last thing that the US wants people to have available. They want you to feel like you've got a limp member, if you drive an economical car. The Honda Civic 3-dr hatchback was a perfectly economical, cool car, that was around for decades. So cool, in fact, that it became a popular target for being souped up by young people. So then, why did Honda eliminate that model and replace it with the shamefully gonad-poor Honda Fit? You do the math.

The other reason why all manufacturers (not just US ones, but of course Japanese and German as well) are pushing bigger vehicles here is because they can get a bigger profit margin on a bigger vehicle. It doesn't take twice as much metal to build an SUV. In fact, some SUVs are built on a similar chassis as a sedan in the same manufacturing line. But you can charge considerably more for the perceived, or potential utility of the vehicles. So if it was clear that this caught on with America, and there were no forces in place that prevented the success of bigger cars (which, in my opinion, is truly an example of industrial devolution), then of course these companies are going to sell those vehicles here. Deterrents could include things such as: 1) mandatory efficiency limits that are respectable, not a joke like they are today, 2) higher fuel taxes, or luxury penalties on gas-guzzling vehicles, to discourage people from being wasteful. In the US, on the contrary, there were ridiculous loopholes that allowed people to write off part of the price of their HUM-V, because it met the qualifications for "farming equipment" based on it's size and weight.

If you really want to be sick, look at this excerpt from Wikipedia. The US plans to have a mandatory 35mpg by the year TWO THOUSAND TWENTY. In contrast, the EU plans on mandating a 47mpg requirement by the year TWO THOUSAND TWELVE. That is sick and shameful. Basically, it's saying that within 10 years, the cars that the US makes need to be as efficient as the ones Japan was making 30 years ago.

And if you're not completely vomiting then go to this Wikipedia link that shows you the actual mpg for many of these European cars I was discussing. There are a huge number of them that average over 50mpg combined city+highway. They're all diesel.

There are a lot of ways the Europeans have got things right, and we don't. And this is one of them.

Stay tuned for more examples.

25 June, 2009

JOSW Day 5: Rain... I mean... Beautiful Salzburg!

It rained again. All day. I think it stopped for about thirty seconds. And mostly heavy rain. Rain that would make a Seattleite use an umbrella. Seriously. The idea of reading, and writing, and vegetating in the Schloss until Rachel gets off work again was seeming like a great idea. Felt a modicum of guilt around this, because I am in AUSTRIA, and I could be walking around town, and seeing sites, and hanging out in cafes and people watching. Yes, yes, yes. I know. But the low energy associated with this weather, and the knowledge, that we would undoubtedly be going into town together, each day, at 5pm when she got out of work, made it easy to say the hell with it, and sit on the balcony. So I did.

Tuesday was a little bit of a bummer, because Rachel had to do lunch with the other interns, and unfortunately for me, this meant that I had no lunch. Of course, I am acting like a complete invalid, because I could have easily walked someplace and had lunch, including some places not far away. But I wasn't that hungry, and was really content to just vegetate here. It's lame, I know. If you post mocking comments, I will probably reject them.

So, the hours passed, I read, I wrote, I stared out the window. And after 5pm we headed down the hill in the rain, with our umbrellas, for a beautiful walk to a Greek Restaurant called Poseidon. It was spectacular. I had some sort of thing callled the Bifstek Special which, seemed to be a salisbury (Salzburg?) steak style of grilled dish that was stuffed with goat cheese. So, so good. Came with scalloped potatoes. I can't remember if potatoes has an "e" in it? Didn't Dan Quayle get ridiculed because of that? Or was that because he put the "e" on the singular form: "Potatoe"? That's what it was. Our waiter, who seemed, again, neither Austrian nor Greek, perhaps Slavic, spoke no English, but he gave us free Uzo, and then brought us more free Uzo at the end of the meal, when he accidentally spilled a tiny amount that was left in my glass. We had a very nice time.

Thinking about those walks in the rain, together, I now wonder why I have not ventured off by myself into town. Because the walks were nice, except that one time in the pouring rain. And the sights are beautiful. And it's so peaceful. I think that I really just like having downtime to write adn relax, and I don't mind waiting for Rachel to be done. Otherwise, I'd be going down the hill, coming up the hill, trying to meet her, needing to get in touch. All sorts of things. This is fine. And I shouldn't feel the need to defend it.

Tuesday night was capped off by the unfortunate yet necessary chore of laundry. Rachel was flat-out of clothing, and we therefore spent the late hours of the evening, until almost 1am, in the Schloss, hanging out with a couple of other interns, and talking about religion, philosophy, the politics and schedule of the seminars at the Schloss, and other topics. I became overtired, and then, of course, became unpleasant to deal with. Fortunately, the night ended with us both acknowledging that I'm a pain, and laughing about it for a bit, and then crashing for a brief but deep sleep.

JOSW Day 4: Rain

I would love to provide a more exciting title for each day's story. But, unfortunately, the most appropriate title for this entry is RAIN. And I will tell you in advance that the best titles for Day 5 and Day 6 (where I now reside) would also be RAIN. Because, in total, it has been raining, usually hard, for all but perhaps fifteen minutes of my entire stay in Salzburg. Summer in Europe. Winter in Seattle. I am having a hard time noticing any difference.

As I mentioned earlier, on this trip, Rachel needed to work on four of the days. That is part of the reason why we are staying in Salzburg from Monday through Thursday, instead of touring around Austria or other countries. They are only allowed a certain amount of vacation time, and we decided that we should save all of that for my second visit, when we will travel to Italy. That does seem like a reasonable tradeoff. Because of the rain, and because of the fact that I did not mind laying low, and getting some relaxation, and perhaps some writing and reading in, I decided to spend the day at the Schloss, in the library that Rachel is managing for the summer. It is a beautiful old library, and it truly looks like something you would find at Hogwarts. That way, we had breakfast together, which is the Schloss's morning buffet of cereals, cheeses, pastries, eggs, coffee, juices, fruits, and nuts, and then we could have lunch together (which required leaving the Schloss since, while Rachel's lunch would have been free at the Schloss, there are no options for me). Plus we could say hello throughout the day. And honestly, though this trip to Europe is a trip to Europe, it was first and foremost, for me, a trip to see Rachel. Oh, how romantic!

So, we had our breakfast, and then I made myself at home on the balcony of the library, with a view of the lake that faces the Schloss. It was quite easy to enjoy the time writing, and reading, and spacing out, happy to not be working (though I did respond to a couple of work emails).

For lunch, we walked part way around the lake to an Italian restaurant called Milano Ristorante, where we ordered from a menu that was nearly identical to what you'd find at Tutta Bella or Via Tribunali, in Seattle. Except for the fact that the prices, even taking into account Euro-to-Dollar conversion, were slightly cheaper than the US analog (especially since tax is included, and tip is considered optional, though we have been tipping as if it were the US). I should note that this is not typically the case here. Food is indeed more expensive, by about 20%, than in Seattle. But I think the Italian gourmet pizza phenomenon is a function of those Seattle establishments having the obnoxious belief that pizza is a delicacy that should be overcharged as if it has slivers of platinum on it, instead of pepperoni. When we got to the end of the meal, our server who looked neither Austrian nor Italian (he seemed Turkish or some other Mediterranean origin to me), did some funny stuff with the bill. For Rachel's pasta and my pizza, the total came to 18,4 Euro, which is about $26. We took out a credit card to pay, and he says "Oh, cash please". And we say "Hm... I am not sure we have enough. You don't take credit cards?", to which he replies "Oh, yes, we do take credit cards, but it costs us a charge from the bank if we use card". So we're fumbling about and realizing that we do not have 18,4 Euro on hand. So Rachel (astutely, I might add) asks the server "How much does the bank charge?", to which server replies "Two percent". And then Rachel notes that she only has 16,5 Euro, and that we'll have to just put it on the card. And then, server says "No, no. Actually this is fine. This is fine. That is enough", to which we debate and say that we don't mind paying a little more to cover the card cost, and that we could also come back and pay him the extra two Euro (plus the tip, that we certainly would have left). He says again "No, no. This is fine. This is enough". Um. Okay. So we thank him. And we leave. But there's something weird about this. Two percent of 18,4 Euro is not even half a Euro. And we underpaid him by two entire Euro, plus whatever tip we couldn't leave. So something fishy was going on. We had a few theories. Rachel's theory is that maybe they have under-the-table workers, and he wants to pay them with cash, so he doesn't have to claim them. My theory was that they are trying to avoid taxes. There is no other logical explanation besides these two, other than the possibility that this guy doesn't know how much two percent is. And I seriously doubt that is the case.

After lunch, we walked the remainder of the way around the lake, where there are many sets of baby geese, baby ducks, baby coots, and all sorts of other baby things. Very cute. Rachel wanted to take them home, and I said no. Plus the cats would eat them. I was just thinking about whether or not I need to make up pseudonyms for the cats too. We'll leave that for another time.

After Rachel got done with work, it was raining a bit harder, but we decided to walk into town to find some dinner. We were very hungry, but nonetheless, we walked past the first place we found that looked good, and wandered up and down the narrow cobblestone alleyways of the entire altstadt, investigating all of the restaurants and shops. Halfway through this process, we'd decided that we were definitely going to eat at the first place we had seen, but nonetheless made the complete tour of the region. Finally, both dizzy from hunger, yet surprisingly not at each others' throats given the state of hunger, we made it back to the original restaurant. What was it called? It was called Zipfer Bierhaus (thank you Google... I mean, Bing... no, I mean Google). This was a very authentic feeling, non-touristy Bierhaus (Beer House, for those who are language challenged). Rachel ordered the Cordon Bleu, and I ordered Schweinschnitzel. Both of these were amazing, and I could not resist but help Rachel finish hers. Along with the fried meats was more beer, and eventually a dessert that was not as good as the meal, but still interesting. Some sort of ice cream cake with whipped cream and nuts.

We left the restaurant, rather late, and it was now raining very hard. We had umbrellas, and were getting drenched anyway. Narrow streets. Puddles. And splashing from cars. It was going to be an unpleasant, at the very least, 35 minute walk back to the Schloss. Taxi. Screw it, we're on vacation. Even if it's a hundred Euros, it's play money, and we'll be much happier back in the Maierhof, comfortable in Rachel's hobbit bed, than splashing around to the Sound of Music in the streets of Salzburg.

So we get the taxi, and he explains to us that we need to go to the "Cash Automatik", which was initially tough to follow, but eventually it becomes clear that he doesn't take credit, but he'll gladly drive by an ATM for us. Very good. While I am getting money, he and Rachel have a discussion about the weather in Salzburg. Turns out, July and August will be beautiful, but June, as he put it, is "Fifty/Fifty". I guess there are going to be a series of sunny days that will balance out the "Hundred/Zero" that we've been having during my visit.

So we took the taxi home, and we were safe in the warmth of the Maierhof. This time, the hobbit bed positioned on the floor, so that if I needed to bail out, it would not result in broken limbs. All in all, a good day, followed by a good night's sleep.